I myself know nothing about breaking in engines. I submit that no one who has posted here saying that their limited individual experience is important or who references those who have no valid credentials knows either.
Those who know aren't people who've bought new motorcycles and had good luck with whatever they've done during their break-in procedures. Individual experiences lack statistical validity.
Those who we should believe are people who have had serious training and experience. Breadth of experience counts. Credentials count.
Don't believe me? How about if I tell you that I've driven for years drunk and had no problems at all. What would you say to me if I suggested that driving drunk is a great way to drive? Would you be comfortable driving drunk because I've lived through it? I hope not.
Here's what Porsche says about breaking I their 911 GT3, a really big bucks performance car. I think they have believable credentials.
I suggest that there's not likely to be that much difference between motorcycle engines and high performance car engines in the break-in procedures:
"Break in hints for the first 2,000 miles/3,000 kilometers. The following tips will be helpful in obtaining optimum performance from your new Porsche.
Despite the most modern, high-precision manufacturing methods, the moving parts must still wear in with each other. This wearing-in occurs mainly in the first 2,000 miles/3,000 kilometers.
Therefore:
Preferably take longer trips.
Avoid frequent cold starts with short-distance driving whenever possible.
Avoid full throttle starts and abrupt stops.
Do not exceed maximum engine speed of 4,200 rpm (revolutions per minute)
Do not run a cold engine at high rpm either in Neutral or in gear...
Tell me, do you think Porsche, who's selling cars well into the 6 figures to people who are buying them for their performance, is going to steer their clients down the wrong road?