Honda CBR 250 Forum banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,105 Posts
I posted on the other thread but what kind of dyno were they using? My stock number is more than you'r tuned number is. I just had a pipe and Dynojet DFC for this graph. Could be a difference in Dyno's Actually nevermind my 23.45 was with a pipe and the 25 was with a pipe and DFC.

 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,726 Posts
altitude or other differences between ya both?

Can't really make out the AFR plot on either of those pics...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
311 Posts
Every dyno reads different. I have seen +/- 10% between different dynos reading the output of the same exact engine and mods. Dynos need to be calibrated too.
What is important is not the absolute numbers but the change in dyno values before and after your mods and tuning. This should be compared on the same dyno always.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,726 Posts
Truth... but even between sessions on the same dyno, you obviously have variance for temperature, humidity, baro pressure, y'know.

"It is what it is" but I agree, 21HP seems a low read... but if the test pilot's happy with the result, who's to argue? :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
455 Posts
a refueled cbr at 21 at any elevation is rally low for any dyno.I have seen some stockers below 23. however having his correction factor set to SAE would be the reason for that. BBR and every other bike dyno I have seen is in STD. Even with that though. I just converted my run to SAE and it was at 24.75.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TX_Dj

· Registered
Joined
·
455 Posts
for reference

"Ideally, every dyno pull would be done under identical atmospheric conditions. This is seldom the case, so a power correction factor (CF) is applied to a measured power reading to compensate for changes in barometric pressure, temperature, and humidity. Theoretically, the power CF helps make it possible to compare dyno runs performed at different locations and under different atmospheric conditions, but it is not 100% accurate. The most common correction factors used are STD (Standard), SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers), and DIN (Deutsche Industrie Norm). Less common are EEC, JIS, and Uncorrected. SAE uses less favorable atmospheric conditions than STD or DIN, and it is the most frequently used for rear wheel testing, however STD is becoming more common. Lower correction factors also tend to be more accurate. It is important to remember however that a CF is only intended to compensate for small atmospheric differences and doesn’t correct for other factors, such as engine and oil temperatures."
 
  • Like
Reactions: TX_Dj

· Premium Member
Joined
·
371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
I will get it scaned soon but if you look carefully air temp, humidity etc is ledgable!
Jeff he did my bike, he does bikes that do 200mph+ at Bonaville Salt Flats!
Maybe he knows what he is doing...
R
 

· Registered
Joined
·
278 Posts
I had my bike dyno tuned today. What a difference it makes!
Randy
I believe the juice box pro is functionally identical to the Dynojet DFC except is has more map slots ( 10 against the DFC 3 ).

It would be very interesting if you could capture the map you are using and post it. I can convert it into a spreadsheet and repost as a comparison with my own. Are you running with closed loop adjustment? I find +3% is working very well. I am also running the third trim pot at +5.

Like you I am really pleased with the improvement.

Regards Roadster
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top