Joined
·
12 Posts
Former motorcycle technician, and used to manage a tire shop for cars/trucks...
Looking at our front rim, the width is only 2.75" with a 110mm wide tire. All sportbikes that have a 120mm tire come with a 3.5" front rim.
So, in reality, we should have a 100/80/17. Almost identical circumference, and tread doesn't pinch to a nearly 90 degree lean angle like on the 110.
The benefit to a 100 over a 110? Well, aside from a more proper profile for the rim width, you have increased grip at lean, YES, I said INCREASED with a narrower tire. That's because as you lean on a 100, you tread contact patch is wider than the 110 because the 110 is too pinched.
Another benefit is the 100 is lighter by 1/2 a lb.
Why did they put a 110 on? To legitimize the bike. Idiots look at the size tire to judge it's performance potential. Smart people look at contact profiles. Since the smart people are in the minority, they manufacture to stupid people's standards...but rather than making the front rim wider which cost extra money and adds weight, they just gave us too big of a front tire to satisfy the squids. =(
So, IRC makes a 100/80/17, which I'll be putting on when I need a change, and running the Bridgeston Bt090 in the rear which is 3.7lbs lighter than the OEM IRC rear tire. And believe me, that much weight far from the axis of rotation (the rear axle bolt) you can DEFINITELY feel.
Stringent weight reduction on my old 636 Kawasai had it cluching up wheelies in 3rd gear on the freeway with stock gearing...normally unheard of, and these were NOT bouce up wheelies or standing on rear pegs, but sit downs!
Anyway, look into it.
Looking at our front rim, the width is only 2.75" with a 110mm wide tire. All sportbikes that have a 120mm tire come with a 3.5" front rim.
So, in reality, we should have a 100/80/17. Almost identical circumference, and tread doesn't pinch to a nearly 90 degree lean angle like on the 110.
The benefit to a 100 over a 110? Well, aside from a more proper profile for the rim width, you have increased grip at lean, YES, I said INCREASED with a narrower tire. That's because as you lean on a 100, you tread contact patch is wider than the 110 because the 110 is too pinched.
Another benefit is the 100 is lighter by 1/2 a lb.
Why did they put a 110 on? To legitimize the bike. Idiots look at the size tire to judge it's performance potential. Smart people look at contact profiles. Since the smart people are in the minority, they manufacture to stupid people's standards...but rather than making the front rim wider which cost extra money and adds weight, they just gave us too big of a front tire to satisfy the squids. =(
So, IRC makes a 100/80/17, which I'll be putting on when I need a change, and running the Bridgeston Bt090 in the rear which is 3.7lbs lighter than the OEM IRC rear tire. And believe me, that much weight far from the axis of rotation (the rear axle bolt) you can DEFINITELY feel.
Stringent weight reduction on my old 636 Kawasai had it cluching up wheelies in 3rd gear on the freeway with stock gearing...normally unheard of, and these were NOT bouce up wheelies or standing on rear pegs, but sit downs!
Anyway, look into it.